Approaches to Reducing Technical Uncertainty in Research and Development Using Patent Analytics
Abstract
The article investigates technical uncertainty in scientific and technical projects aimed at creating high-tech products. The main goal is to systematize types of uncertainty and assess the impact of technical uncertainty, using patent analysis to reduce risks. The research introduces novelty in risk management methods through patent analytics and offers practical recommendations for improving decision-making in innovative projects. The conclusions emphasize the importance of patents in minimizing uncertainty and risks, pointing to the need for further research in integrating patent analytics into innovation management. The article is addressed to researchers and specialists in the field of innovation management and patent analytics.
About the Authors
F. A. Batanov
FIPS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Fedor Batanov - Head of the Project Office of the Federal Institute of Industrial Property
D. I. Sergeichik
FIPS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Daria Sergeichik - Leading Analyst of the Project Office of the Federal Institute of Industrial Property
References
1. Spencer R.W. Managing Under Uncertainty // ResearchTechnology Management. 2014. Т. 57. № 5. С. 53–54.
2. Argote L., McEvily B., Reagans R. Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes // Management Science. 2003. Т. 49. № 4. С. 571–582.
3. Teece D., Peteraf M., Leih S. Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy // California Management Review. 2016. Т. 58. № 4. С. 13–35.
4. Sannö A., Ahlskog M. Integrating knowledge for manufacturing technology development // IJPD. 2019. Т. 23. № 1. С. 65.
5. Комаров А.В. Модель комплексной оценки технологической готовности инновационных научно-технологических проектов / А.В. Комаров, А.Н. Петров, А.В. Сартори // Экономика науки. – 2018. – Т. 4, № 1. – С. 47–57. – DOI: 10.22394/2410–132X-2017–4–1–47–57.
6. OECD. Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development.– Paris: OECD, 2015.
7. O’Connor G. C., Rice M.P. A Comprehensive Model of Uncertainty Associated with Radical Innovation // J of Product Innov Manag. 2013. Т. 30. № S1. С. 2–18.
8. Lasso S. et al. Exploring the link between uncertainty and project activities in new product development // Journal of Engineering Design. 2020. Т. 31. № 11–12. С. 531–551.
9. Hooge S. et al. Gambling versus Designing: Organizing for the Design of the Probability Space in the Energy Sector // Creat Innov Manage. 2016. Т. 25. № 4. С. 464–483.
10. Herstatt C., Verworn B., Nagahira A. Reducing project related uncertainty in the «fuzzy front end» of innovation: a comparison of German and Japanese product innovation projects // IJPD. 2004. Т. 1. № 1. С. 43.
11. Sicotte H., Bourgault M. Dimensions of uncertainty and their moderating effect on new product development project performance // R & D Management. 2008. Т. 38. № 5. С. 468–479.
12. Stupples. Application of the systems approach to defining major projects for successful implementation // 1995.
13. Migilinskas D., Ustinovicius L. Methodology of risk and uncertainty management in construction’s technological and economical problems // The 25th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. ISARC-2008. Vilnius, Lithuania: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Publishing House Technika, 2008. С. 789–795.
14. Moiseev V.V. et al. Methods for removing uncertainty in multi-criteria problems of effectiveness evaluation of decision-making // J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2019. Т. 1353. № 1. С. 012100.
15. Grigorio P. et al. Decision Making for Designing Infrastructure Projects: The Case of the City of Larissa, Greece // JEA. 2019. Т. 7. № 1.
16. Qabazard A.M. Risk Management Practices in Project Activities at North Kuwait Oil Fields. Ancona, Italy:, 2019. С. 121–130.
17. Ена О. Методология разработки патентных ландшафтов Проектного офиса ФИПС / О. Ена, Н. Попов // Станкоинструмент.– 2019. – № 1 (14). – С. 28–35. – DOI: 10.22184/24999407.2019.14.01.28.35.
18. Engineering Geology for Society and Territory – Volume 6: Applied Geology for Major Engineering Projects / под ред. G. Lollino и др. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015.
19. Дорофеев Г.Е. Правовая культура в современном обществе // ТРНиО.– 2022.– Т. 92, № 7.– С. 72–75.
20. Garland N.P. и др. Model Based Definition: Finally, the Engineering Drawing Killer? // DS 95: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2019), University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. 12th –13th September 2019.: The Design Society, 2019.
21. Bin Ahmad Zaini A.H. et al. Challenges and Lessons Learnt on Waste Management and Disposal from Mauritania Deepwater Abandonment and Decommissioning Campaign // Day 2 Wed, December 01, 2021. Virtual: SPE, 2021. С. D021S004R001.
22. Irene Troy, R. Werle. Uncertainty and the Market for Patents≈// 2008.
23. Cacciabue P.C. Human error risk management for engineering systems: a methodology for design, safety assessment, accident investigation and training // Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2004. Т. 83. № 2. С. 229–240.
24. Батанов Ф.А. Применение патентной аналитики на разных стадиях готовности НИОКР для снижения рисков / Ф.А. Батанов, Д.И. Сергейчик // Вестник ФИПС.– 2023.– Т. 2, № 3 (5).– С. 23–32.
25. Федоров Д.А. Оценка неопределенности инновационных процессов // Экономика и экологический менеджмент. 2014. № 2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenkaneopredelennosti-innovatsionnyh-protsessov (дата обращения: 04.03.2024).
26. Zhdanov I. Yu., Zhdanov V. Yu. Investment Valuation of Projects and Business: Izdatelstvo Prospekt LLC, 2019.
Review
For citations:
Batanov F.A., Sergeichik D.I. Approaches to Reducing Technical Uncertainty in Research and Development Using Patent Analytics. Bulletin of Federal institute of industrial property. 2024;3(1):52-65. (In Russ.)
Views:
34
JATS XML
Email this article 