Strategic approaches to intellectual property management and knowledge capitalization in scientific and educational organizations

Efficient mechanisms for managing intellectual property are critical for ensuring scientific and technological sovereignty and economic growth, related to scientific and educational organizations that are drivers of innovation. This study aims to identify the current state of research on the intellectual property management systems and the strategic development of universities, while also exploring new approaches to enhance intellectual property management in scientific and educational organizations in Russia. To incorporate global best practices, we performed a bibliometric and scientometric analysis of scholarly publications indexed in the international database Lens.org. The term map generated for strategic intellectual property management in universities reveals a notable shift in research emphasis – from traditional agreements, licensing, and joint ventures toward open innovation models, principles, conditions, transformations, innovation activities, projects, and digital platforms. A pivotal aspect of a successful intellectual property management involves fostering an environment where research outcomes can seamlessly be transferred to practical application. Strategic approaches to intellectual property management should be systemic and designed with consideration of both the infrastructure supporting intellectual property development and the products derived from these assets. Implementing such an approach at the university level, aligned with strategic planning objectives and encompassing three core dimensions of intellectual property strategy (organization, author, product), holds significant practical implications for Russian universities. Ultimately, flexible, collaborative, and adaptable strategies are essential for navigating dynamic market and technological landscapes, thereby bolstering the competitiveness of scientific and academic institutions. 

1. Suglobov, A. E., Orlova, K. S., Zharov, A. N., Katys, P., & Novikov, A. V. (2021). Intellectual property policy of universities: specific regulation. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, 14 (33), e16155. http://dx.doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v14i33.16155

2. Afanasyev, A. A., Borovskaya, M. A., Kolesnikov Yu. A. and Fedosova T. V. (ed.) (2023), Upravlenie intellektualnoj sobstvennostyu v ekonomike znanij: pravovoe regulirovanie i kommercializaciya [Intellectual Property Management in the Knowledge Economy: legal regulation and commercializationh], Izdatelstvo Yuzhnogo federalnogo universiteta, Rostov-na-Donu; Taganrog, Russia.

3. Kortov, S. V., Terlyga, N. G., Shulgin. D. B., Unegova, I. E. Patent Strategy as a Key Component of Innovation Development in Universities. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2019; 23 (5): 85–96. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2019.05.044.

4. Ivliev, G. P., Zubov, Yu. S., Erivanceva, T. N. and Kalyatin, V. O. (2023), Foreign experience in using patent pools as one of the tools of a patent strategy that facilitates access to patented technologies, Law and digital economy, no 1 (19), pp. 7–27, DOI 10.17803/2618–8198.2023.19.1.007–027.

5. Rudaya, I. L. (2019), Problems of strategic management of intellectual property of Russian innovative organizations, Upravlenie, no 1, pp. 50–59.

6. Novikov, S.V., Kulikov, S. P. Development of a Toolkit for an Intellectual Property Management System for Higher Education Institutions. Russ. Engin. Res. 44, 584–589 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X2470045X.

7. Carayannis, E.G., Meissner, D. & Edelkina, A. Targeted innovation policy and practice intelligence (TIP2E): concepts and implications for theory, policy and practice. J Technol Transf 42, 460–484 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961–015–9433–8

8. Carayannis, E.G., Meissner, D. Glocal targeted open innovation: challenges, opportunities and implications for theory, policy and practice. J Technol Transf 42, 236–252 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961–016–9497–0

9. Dubina, I.N., Campbell, D.F.J., Carayannis, E.G. et al. The Balanced Development of the Spatial Innovation and Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Based on Principles of the Systems Compromise: A Conceptual Framework. J Knowl Econ 8, 438–455 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132–016–0426–0

10. Neretin, O. P., Aleksandrova, A. V. and Gorushkina, S. N. (2023), Features of the formation and development of digital ecosystems of intellectual property, Cifrovye intellektual’nye ekosistemy v ekonomike i promyshlennosti [Digital intelligent ecosystems in the economy and industry], POLITEKH-PRESS, Sankt-Peterburg, Russia, DOI 10.18720/IEP/2023.5/3.

11. Budyldina, N. (2018), Entrepreneurial universities and regional contribution. Int Entrep Manag J 14, 265–277, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365–018–0500–0/

12. Medvedev, V. V. (2021), The National project «Science and Universities’ as a mechanism of state support for the development of territories with high scientific and technological potential, Civilizaciya znanij: rossijskie realii: Sbornik trudov XXII Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii [Civilization of Knowledge: Russian Realities: Proceedings of the XXII International Scientific Conference], Civilizaciya znanij: rossijskie realii [Civilization of Knowledge: Russian Realities] Moscow, Russia, 15–24 April 2021, pp. 106–109.

13. Makarov, A. M. (2022), Topical issues of intellectual property management at the university, Upravlenie intellektualnoj sobstvennostyu v Udmurtskoj Respublike: Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii [Intellectual property management in the Udmurt Republic: Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference], Upravlenie intellektualnoj sobstvennostyu v Udmurtskoj Respublike [Intellectual property management in the Udmurt Republic], Izhevsk, Russia, 25 October 2022, pp. 4–5.

14. Kletkina, Yu. A. (2020), Management of intellectual property of the university through the Intellectual Property Department, Alleya nauki, vol. 1, no 4 (43), pp. 291–295.

15. Gvozdeckaya, I. V. and S. E. Majkova (2024), Intellectual property is a factor in ensuring technological sovereignty and economic security, Intellectual property. Industrial property, no 1, pp. 32–43.