Improving the Еurasian patent legislation taking into account the patent legislation of the People’s Republic of China
Abstract
The article is devoted to the results of the study and comparative analysis of patent legislation and practice of the patent system of the People’s Republic of China and the Eurasian Patent Office. This analysis is relevant for the improvement of the Eurasian patent system. The purpose of the study is to develop proposals aimed to improving the Eurasian patent legislation. The novelty and practical value of the article lies in the comparative analysis of the legal and practical aspects of patenting inventions in the People’s Republic of China and the Eurasian Patent Office, and in conclusions that the regulatory framework and practical approaches in assessing the patentability of inventions, including selective ones, have much in common. Also, the practical value of the article lies in the proposals for the development of new legal dispositions for their inclusion in the regulatory framework of the Eurasian patent organization. In this article we propose to consider the most interesting norms and methodological approaches in assessing the patentability of inventions.
About the Authors
A. V. Ceban
Eurasian patent organization
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aurellia V. Ceban, Deputy Director Examination Department – Director Chemistry and Medicine division
Moscow, M. Cherkassky lane, 2
E. B. Gavrilova
Eurasian Patent Organization
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena B. Gavrilova, Head of the Quality Monitoring Center
Moscow, M. Cherkassky lane, 2
A. A. Lomakina
Federal Institute of Industrial Property
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastasiia A. Lomakina, junior researcher of the Center
of Scientific Activity Management
Moscow, Berezhkovskaya emb., 30, building 1)
References
1. Qing Zhong (2013), Development of intellectual property mechanism in China and Russia: similarities and differences, Statistics and Economics, no 4, pp. 119–123.
2. Kuznetsov, Y. D. (2024), “Intellectual property in the scientific field”, Intellectual Property. Industrial Property, no 3, pp. 55–57.
3. Borzenko, D. and Poltorak, S. (2024), “Features of the modern patent system in China: stages and factors of formation, specifics of institutionalization, strategic approaches to development”, Intellectual property in Belarus, no 6 (109), pp. 37–45.
4. Salitsky, A. I. and Salitskaya, E. A. (2022), “China on the way to global technological leadership”, Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vol.92, no. 5, pp. 451–457. – DOI 10.31857/S0869587322050085.
5. Anisimtsev, N. V. (2022), History and modernity of the formation of copyright and intellectual property in China, Historical events in the life of China and modernity, Russian Academy of Sciences; Federal Autonomous State Institution of Science Institute of China and Modern Asia, Institute of China and Modern Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vol. VII, pp. 167–187. DOI 10.48647/IFES.2022.81.29.025
6. Negulyaev, G. A. (2023), “On the practice of stimulating invention in the field of green technologies”, Copyright (Bulletin of the Academy of Intellectual Property), no. 3, pp. 108–127.
7. Spartak, A. N. (2024), “China’s economic potential and development plans in the context of Russian-Chinese cooperation”, Russian Foreign Economic Journal, no. 7, pp. 7–25. DOI 10.24412/2072-8042-2024-7-7-25.
8. Chentsova, E. P. and Chentsov M. S. (2023), “Features of the country’s innovative development: China’s experience”, Russian journal of innovation economics, Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1835–1854. DOI 10.18334/vinec.13.4.120104.
9. Gulyaeva, T. K. (2024), The relationship of “WTO law” and the national law of the member states, 2nd ed stereotypical, Law House “Justicinform”, Moscow, Russia, pp. 228. ISBN 978–5–7205–2010–6.
10. Demidchik, A. A. (2024), “Intellectual resources as a factor of ensuring technological sovereignty”, Belarusian State Economic University Bulletin, no. 3 (164), pp. 35–44.
11. Pokrovskaya, A.V. (2023), Comparative analysis of the standard of non-obviousness in Chinese and American patent law, Actual problems of intellectual property law: Collection of reports of the interuniversity scientific and practical conference of students and young scientists, April 26 In 2021. Saint Petersburg: Scythia-Print LLC, St. Petersburg, pp. 76–80.
12. Ivliev. G. et al (2024), Fundamentals of the formation of a modern common information and expert space in the field of industrial property in the Eurasian region, Federal State Budgetary Institution “Federal Institute of Industrial Property”, Moscow, Russia, pp. 344. ISBN 978-5-907602-20-5.
13. Zayats, A. (2023), “Intellectual property is a key aspect of the economic integration of the Eurasian region”, Intellectual property in Belarus, no.2 (99), pp. 29–33.
14. Arakelova, A. O. (2023), “Strategy of intellectual property development in the Eurasian space”, Copyright (Bulletin of the Academy of Intellectual Property), no. 4, pp. 5–56.
15. Komendantov, S. V. (2023), “On the main provisions of the Agreement on Trade and Economic cooperation between the EAEU and China”, International legal courier, no. 7, pp. 49–53.
16. Shimkovich, M. N. and Bazaya, K. D. (2023), Legal aspects of state regulation of parallel imports in the Republic of Belarus, Problems of civil law and process: Collection of scientific articles, Yanka Kupala Grodno State University, Grodno, pp. 219–229.
17. Maidannik, O. V., Gaponenko, M. A. and Dashkova, M. O., (2022), “Legal aspects of granting protection to inventions, utility models and industrial designs in Russia and abroad”, Intellectual property. Industrial property, no. 12, pp. 32–46.
Review
For citations:
Ceban A.V., Gavrilova E.B., Lomakina A.A. Improving the Еurasian patent legislation taking into account the patent legislation of the People’s Republic of China. Bulletin of Federal institute of industrial property. 2025;4(2):128-137. (In Russ.)
Views:
17
JATS XML
Email this article 