Compensation for Infringement of Exclusive Rights: Main Development Trends
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to examine the trends in the development of compensation as a measure of liability for infringement of exclusive rights, under the influence of its practical application. Judicial statistics indicate that claims for compensation by copyright holders are the most common way to protect exclusive rights. This study analyzes legal approaches developed through a number of decisions of the Constitutional Court of Russia and the Plenum of the Supreme Court, No. 10, as well as their impact on judicial practice, particularly that of the Intellectual Property Court. As a result of the study, a trend has been identified indicating a decrease in the number of claims based on calculating compensation twice the cost of the goods in favor of claims for compensation twice the cost of use. However, due to the lack of a developed market, copyright holders face difficulties in proving the value of their rights. This, in turn, creates significant challenges for courts in assessing the evidence presented regarding this value. Based on the study conducted, an assessment of the effectiveness of existing and modern legal approaches to the compensation mechanism in the system of civil liability measures was given. The clarifications from higher courts encourage courts to more thoroughly analyze the factual circumstances of a particular dispute, which in turn leads to more complicated compensation cases. As a result, the compensation mechanism has become a more complex way to protect exclusive rights compared to claims for damages, as the legislator has lowered the standards of proof for these claims. Current proposals to amend the legislation governing the application of compensation from the perspective of difficulties faced by law enforcement practice are also considered.
About the Author
L. A. NovoselovaRussian Federation
Ludmila A. Novoselova, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, President
Moscow, Ogorodny dr-way, 5 bld. 2
References
1. Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated 07/24/2020 No. 40-P “On the case of checking the constitutionality of subparagraph 2 of paragraph 4 of Article 1515 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the request of the Fifteenth Arbitration Court of Appeal”, [Online], available at: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/348960–8?ysclid=m17uhsptle440967988 (Accessed 2 Aug. 2024).
2. Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated December 13, 2016 No. 28-P “In the case of checking the constitutionality of subparagraph 1 of Article 1301, subparagraph 1 of Article 1311 and subparagraph 1 of paragraph 4 of Article 1515 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in connection with requests from the Arbitration Court of the Altai Territory”, [Online], available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_208711/?ysclid=m1907foo1c778552255 (Accessed: 02.08.2024).
3. Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated 02/13/2018 No. 8-P “On the case of checking the Constitutionality of the provisions of paragraph 4 of Article 1252, Article 1487 and paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of Article 1515 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of the PAG Limited Liability Company”, [Online], available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_290909/?ysclid=m19098xo51942189043 (Accessed 2 Aug. 2024).
4. Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated 12/14/2023 No. 57-P “In the case of checking the constitutionality of paragraph 3 of Article 1252 and subparagraph 2 of paragraph 4 of Article 1515 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the request of the Intellectual Property Court”, [Online], available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_464376/?ysclid=m190e7qcg4615595738 (Accessed 2 Aug. 2024).
5. The concept of the development of civil legislation of the Russian Federation (approved by the decision of the Council under the President of the Russian Federation on Codification and Improvement of Civil Legislation dated 07.10.2009) (2009), Vestnik Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda Rossijskoj Federacii, no 11, p. 20.
6. Information Letter of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation dated December 13, 2007 No. 122 “Review of the practice of arbitration courts in cases related to the application of intellectual property legislation” (2008), Vestnik Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda Rossijskoj Federacii, no 2, pp. 79-99.
7. Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated December 13, 2016 No. 28-П, [Online], available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_208711/?ysclid=m190fci2on233215956 (Accessed: 02.08.2024).
8. Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 04/23/2019 No. 10 “On the application of Part Four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation”, [Online], available at: https://www.vsrf.ru/documents/own/27773/?ysclid=m190g78o2p684064458 (Accessed 2 Aug. 2024).
9. Resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation dated November 30, 2010 No. 10521/10, [Online], available at: https://arbitr.ru/materials/32048?path=%2Farxiv%2Fpost_pres%2F&ysclid=m190i9aqaq664353602 (Accessed 2 Aug. 2024).
10. Resolution of the Intellectual Property Rights Court dated 06/24/2024 in case no. A53–39679/2023, [Online], available at: https://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=SIP&n=109760&ysclid=m190kvqrtz19362072#Yf32oOUzmQog4xl5 (Accessed 2 Aug. 2024).
11. An information note prepared based on the results of summarizing the judicial practice of the Intellectual Property Rights Court as a court of cassation, taking into account the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on certain issues arising when collecting compensation for copyright and related rights violations, approved by Resolution of the Presidium of the Intellectual Property Rights Court dated 04/05/2017 No. СП-23/10 based on the results discussions with the participation of members of the Scientific Advisory Council at the Intellectual Property Rights Court, [Online], available at: https://ipc.arbitr.ru/storage/sites/ipc/files/288/spravka_compensation_copyright.pdf (Accessed 2 Aug. 2024).
12. Resolution of the Intellectual Property Rights Court dated 04/05/2022 in case no. A32–36309/2020, [Online], available at: https://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=SIP&n=92085&ysclid=m190m83qd9659953773#EwJ2oOU8EhCUTbPp (Accessed 2 Aug. 2024).
13. Resolution of the Intellectual Property Rights Court dated 26/01/2024 in case no. А56–81463/2022, [Online], available at: https://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=SIP&n=109760&ysclid=m190nerdv1789540391#KLY2oOU7AtEDXt06 (Accessed 2 Aug. 2024).
14. Resolution of the Intellectual Property Rights Court dated 09/04/2024 in case no. А40–121808/2023, [Online], available at: https://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=MARB&n=2562304&ysclid=m190o1mvgk250988433#V2g2oOUnZNI0xeb (Accessed 2 Aug. 2024).
15. Passport of Draft Law No. 348960–8 “On Amendments to Part Four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation”, [Online], available at: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/348960–8 (Accessed 2 Aug. 2024).
16. Draft Federal Law No. 638828–8 “On Amendments to Article 1515 of Part Four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation”, [Online], available at: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru (Accessed 2 Aug. 2024).
Review
For citations:
Novoselova L.A. Compensation for Infringement of Exclusive Rights: Main Development Trends. Bulletin of Federal institute of industrial property. 2024;3(3):220-231. (In Russ.)
JATS XML










