The impact of the state scientific and technical policy on the growth of academic publishing and patenting
Abstract
The article summarizes some of the comparative analysis results between academic publishing and patenting as the most common results of scientific researches performed by higher education institutions and scientific organizations for the 2012 to 2022 period. A critical overview of the primary scientometric indicators used for the evaluation of scientific work and their flaws are provided in the research. The relevance of the research is determined by the need to implement the national system for evaluating the effectiveness of scientific research and development. The practical value of the research lies in the fact that normative legal acts as well as their impact on the patenting and publishing are analyzed during the period under review. The main methods of the study were analysis and comparison. The critical role of the national system which estimates the effectiveness of scientific researches and innovations that underpins the achievement of scientific and technological sovereignty is substantiated in the research. The results of the research can be used to analyze the state scientific and technical policy and its further advancements. The directions for further research can involve analyzing some structural changes in the measuring of the effectiveness of higher education institutions and scientific organizations in the short term.
About the Author
D. A. RozhnovaRussian Federation
Diana А. Rozhnova, Head of the department for the national project and government program support of the Center for Interaction with Authorities
Moscow, Berezhkovskaya emb., 30 bld. 1
References
1. Parshin, A. (2018), “Science or bibliometry: who will win?” Vestnik RAS 88 (11), pp.982–984 DOI: 10.31857/S086958730002330–1.
2. Neretin, O.P. (2022), Intellectual sovereignty of Russian economy, Federal Institute of Industrial Property, Moscow, Russia.
3. Vislij, А. and Borisova, M.S. (2023), Publications and patents as an indicator of the success of scientific and educational organizations in modern conditions. XXVII International Scientific and Practical Conference “Intellectual Property for State and People”. Federal Institute of Industrial Property, Moscow, pp.19–23.
4. Iljina, I.E., Borodik, K.А., Lobov, А.А., Panov, L.А. and Marcinkovskij, S. S. (2022), Trendy publikacionnoj aktivnosti rossijskich issledovatelej po dannim Web of Science, Scopus [Trends in the publication activity of Russian researchers according to Web of Science, Scopus]. RIEP, Moscow, Russia.
5. Lopatin, V.N. (2014) Shestoj mezhdunarodnij Forum “Innovaconnoe razvitie cherez rynok intellektualnoj sobstvennosti”. Sbornik documentov I materialov [On the outcomes of the VI International Forum “Innovative Development through the Intellectual Property Market], аvailable at: https://biblio.rniiis.ru/knigi/194-vimezhdunarodnyj-forum-innovatsionnoe-razvitie-cherezrynok-intellektualnoj-sobstvennosti-sbornik-dokumentovi-materialov (Accessed 15 March 2024).
6. Neretin, O.P. and Lopatina, N.V. (2022), “Exploring ways to present the results of domestic research and developments”, Bulletin of Federal Institute of Industrial Property, vol. 1, no 1 (1), pp.6–19.
Review
For citations:
Rozhnova D.A. The impact of the state scientific and technical policy on the growth of academic publishing and patenting. Bulletin of Federal institute of industrial property. 2024;3(3):242-251. (In Russ.)
JATS XML









