New approaches to intellectual property management in the subjects of the Russian Federation
Abstract
This article examines the prevailing views on the management of intellectual property in the subjects of the Russian Federation. The methodological inconsistency of approaches applied to the development of the intellectual property (IP) management system at the regional level is revealed, insufficient consideration of the importance of IP in the process of forming the scientific and technological development of the region is noted. In this regard, the purpose of this study was to search for new approaches to the formation of an effective IP management system in the regions, taking into account the specifics of their economies. In this work, a systematic approach and a method for identifying “weak links’ in the value chain, as well as metatheoretical level methods, are used. The key elements that an effective IP management system at the level of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation should contain have been formed.
About the Author
M. G. Ivanova
Federal Institute of Industrial Property
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina G. Ivanova, Dr. Sci. (Sociology), Leading researcher at Research and Education Center
Moscow, Berezhkovskaya emb., 30, bld. 1
References
1. Byvshev, V. I., Pisarev, I. V. and Gubenko, D. V. (2023) “Evaluation of the Development of the Intellectual Property Field in the Russian Federation’s Regions and Methodological Approaches”, Science Governance and Scientometrics, vol. 18, no 1, pp.30-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33873/2686–6706.2023.18–1.30-62.
2. Aleksandrova, A. V. (2022), “Portfolio Method in the Evaluation of Intellectual Property Management Processes at the Regional Level”, Science Governance and Scientometrics, vol. 17, no 3, pp. 309-328. DOI 10.33873/2686–6706.2022.17–3.309-328.
3. Zubov, Yu. S. and Neretin, O. P. (2022), “Rospatent in the Management of Regional Development in the Development Paradigm of the Intellectual Property Area”, Science Governance and Scientometrics, vol. 17, no 1, pp. 67-81. DOI 10.33873/2686–6706.2022.17–1.67-81.
4. Ivanova, M. G., Aleksandrova, A. V., Anikeeva, M. Yu. and Aleksandrov, Yu. D. (2020), “Rating tools as means for assessing innovative and Patent activity in a region (on the Voronezh region example)”, Region: sistemy, ekonomika, upravlenie, no 3, pp. 83–90.
5. Lepehin, V. A., Beliakov, S. A. and Lepehin, V. V. (2022), “Solidarnaya ekonomika” kak novyj sposob proizvodstva [“Solidary economy” as a new way of production], Konceptual, Moscow, Russia.
6. Lepehin, V. and Muhina, I. (2022) “Solidary economy: values, not profits”, availiable at: https://dzen.ru/video/watch/62f53d3358c83462e42397df?ysclid=m0c7i7ss4b140416248 (Accessed 25 May 2024).
7. Leontiev, V.V. (1997), Mezhotraslevaya ekonomika [Intersectoral Economics], Translated by Granberg, A.G., Ekonomika, Moscow, Russia.
8. Zubov, Yu. S. (2022), “Promoting the formation of Rrussia’s technological sovereignty is a key task of Rospatent”, Bulletin of Federal Institute of Industrial Property, vol. 1, no 1, pp. 10–15.
9. Neretin, O. P. (2022), “Intellectual property in regions of Russia”, available at: https://national-expertise.ru/blog/regional-ip/?ysclid=lyd2rjm58733145911 (Accessed 25 May 2024).
10. Voprosy kommercializacii v sfere intellektual’noj sobstvennosti v Rossijskoj Federacii [Issues of commercialization in the field of intellectual property in the Russian Federation] (2022), Izdanie Gosudarstvennoj Dumy, Moscow, Russia.
11. Kozlovskaja, O. V., Akerman Ye. N. and Burets, Yu. S. (2015). “Analysis of the state of intellectual property in the regions of Russia”, ECO, no 6 (492). pp. 75–92.
Review
For citations:
Ivanova M.G. New approaches to intellectual property management in the subjects of the Russian Federation. Bulletin of Federal institute of industrial property. 2024;3(3):292-298. (In Russ.)
Views:
13
JATS XML
Email this article 