On some trends in the development of the system of restrictions on exclusive rights in the era of development of digital forms of using the results of intellectual activity
EDN: EEYMPI
Abstract
The article presents certain trends in the development of a system of restrictions on exclusive rights that allow you to regulate the balance between the opposing individual interests of holders of civil rights and public interests in the era of development of digital forms of using the results of intellectual activity. The article was prepared as part of the research program of the Institute of Digital law of the National Research University Higher School of Economics conducted in 2021.
About the Author
V. Kalyatin
Aiekseev Research Center for Private Law under the President of the Russian Federation, Department of Digital Technology Law and Biolaw, Faculty of Law, National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ph.D. candidate in Law, Associate Professor (VAK), Professor of Aiekseev Research Center for Private Law under the President of the Russian Federation, Associate Professor, Department of Digital Technology Law and Biolaw, Faculty of Law, National Research University Higher School of Economics
References
1. Право интеллектуальной собственности. Т. 1 Общие положения: / под общ. ред. проф. Л.А. Новоселовой. М.: Статут, 2017. С. 128.
2. Микрюков В.А. Ограничения и обременения гражданских прав. М.: Статут, 2007, цит. по СПС «КонсультантПлюс».
3. Geiger, C.: Flexibilising copyright – remedies to the privatisation of information
4. by copyright law. Int. Instrum. Controls 39, 178 (2008).
5. Guibault, L.: Why cherrypicking never leads to harmonisation: the case of the limitations of copyright under directive 2001/29/EC. JIPITEC 1, 55 (2010); Hugenholtz, P.B., Senftleben, M.: Fair Use in Europe: in Search of Flexibilities, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2013239.
6. Van Eechoud, M.: Harmonizing European Copyright Law. The Challenges of Better Lawmaking. Kluwer Law International, The Hague (2009).
7. Калятин В. О. О некоторых тенденциях в развитии концепции «добросовестного использования» в современном авторском праве стран «общего права» // Право, 2013, №3, С. 136-150.
8. Калятин В. О. О перспективах применения в России доктрины добросовестного использования // Закон, 2015, № 11, С. 40-47.
9. Noguchi Y. Digital Copyright in the U.S. and Japan. VDM Verlag Dr. Műller, Saarbrűcken, 2009. Р. 85
10. Burrell R., Coleman A. Copyright Exceptions. The Digital Impact. Cambridge University Press, 2006. P. 276-277.
11. Микрюков В.А. Ограничения и обременения гражданских прав. М.: Статут, 2007, цит. по СПС «КонсультантПлюс».
12. Pessach G. Networked Memory Institutions: Social Remembering, Privatization and its Discontents // Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal. 2008. №. 26. P. 71.
13. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2021/06/the-internet-is-acollective-hallucination/619320/ ( Дата обращения: 21.07.2022).
14. Сагдеева Л.В. Ограничения и обременения права собственности и исключительного права // ИС. Авторское право и смежные права. 2020. № 3.
15. Castle Rock Entertainment v. Carol Publishing Group, 150 F 3d 132, 145 n. 11 (2 Cir. 1998).
16. American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, 60 F 3d 913, 930 (2 Cir 1994).
17. Burrell R., Coleman A. Copyright Exceptions. The Digital Impact. Cambridge University Press, 2006. P. 304-305.
18. Harris J. Property and Justice. Oxford, 1996. P. 101.
Review
For citations:
Kalyatin V. On some trends in the development of the system of restrictions on exclusive rights in the era of development of digital forms of using the results of intellectual activity. Bulletin of Federal institute of industrial property. 2022;1(1):30-35. (In Russ.) EDN: EEYMPI
Views:
52
JATS XML
Email this article 