Key issues of the state and regional intellectual property management system

The development of an innovative economy is impossible without ensuring a systematic approach to intellectual property management. In this regard, centralization of intellectual property management, strategic planning of intellectual property development and flexible mechanisms for regulating relevant public relations are of particular importance, which in the article are considered as key conditions for the technological leadership of the state. The purpose of the article is to substantiate proposals for improving the intellectual property management system based on an analysis of key issues of its functioning. The research is based on a doctrinal, historical, and comparative legal analysis of regulations, strategic documents, and intellectual property management practices. It is shown that the creation of a single governing body and the adoption of a strategic document can ensure the integrity of state policy in the field of intellectual property. The increasing role of the Eurasian Patent Organization in the intellectual property management system and the importance of manuals as a tool for flexible regulatory regulation are substantiated. The novelty of the research lies in the systematic substantiation of the intellectual property management model integrating the national and regional levels, where the key operating conditions are the centralization of the public administration system and the adoption of a strategic document that assigns special regulatory importance to guidelines. The conclusions and suggestions obtained can be used to improve the system of state management of intellectual property and regional mechanisms for the protection of industrial property. Further research is related to evaluating the effectiveness of the proposed intellectual property management model and its adaptation in the states of the Eurasian region.

1. Arakelova, A. O. (2023), “Strategy for the development of intellectual property in the Eurasian space”, Copyright (Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Intellectual Property), no. 4, pp. 5–56.

2. Darina, O. N. and Negulyaev, G.A. (2025), “Stimulating innovation and inventive activity in the People’s Republic of China”, Intellectual Property. Industrial Property, no. 4, pp. 75–84.

3. Ivliev, G. P. (2024), “Medium- and long-term objectives of intellectual property law in the Eurasian Region”, Journal of Russian Law, no. 1, pp. 18–24.

4. Novoselova, L. A. and Grin, O. S. (2018), “Effectiveness of legal protection of intellectual property rights: administrative barriers”, Law. Journal of The Higher School of Economics, no. 2, pp. 4–25.

5. Volkov, A. T. and Shepelev, R. E. (2022), “Organizational structures of intellectual property management in the Commonwealth of Independent States as a factor in creating a free innovation market”, Economics of Science, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 140–151.

6. Ivliev, G. P. (2025), “Centralization of intellectual property governance in the context of regional IP regulation”, Intellectual Property, no. 8, pp. 20–25.

7. Imanov, K. (2025), “On the formation and functioning of a modern intellectual property office”, Intellectual Property. Industrial Property, no. 5, pp. 37–79.

8. Minbaleev, A. V. (2016), “The system of public governance in the field of intellectual property”, Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Law, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 112–115.

9. Perekislov, V. E. (2026), “Issues of state regulation of intellectual property relations”, Economics. Law. Innovations, no. 2, pp. 27–32.

10. Sergeev, A. P. (2008), “The main issues of legal protection of intellectual property in the Russian Federation at the present stage”, in Lopatin, V. N. (ed.) The Topical Issues of Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property. The collection of scientific papers. Volume 1, Urait, Moscow, Russia, pp. 10–17.

11. Khurtin, D. O. (2016), “Powers of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation to develop state policy in the field of copyright and related rights”, Culture: Management, Economics, Law, no. 4, pp. 41–46.

12. Zayats, A. P. (2023), “Intellectual property is a key aspect of the economic integration of the Eurasian region”, Intellectual property in Belarus, no. 2 (99), pp. 29–33.

13. Ivliev, G. P. and Egorova, M. A. (2025), “Development of legal integration in the field of intellectual property in the Eurasian space”, Law and Digital Economy, no. 3, pp. 5–11.

14. Ivliev, G. P. (2025), “Directions for the development of the Eurasian Patent Organization in light of contemporary challenges”, Law of Intellectual Property, no. 4, pp. 29–32.

15. Ivliev, G. P. and Shevyreva, Zh. I. (2023), “Guidelines as a new type of regulatory act”, State and Law, no. 7, pp. 174–177.