Comparative analysis of inventive and publication activity as forms of reporting on the results of scientific and educational organizations of higher education

The relevance of the study is conditioned by the revision of performance indicators of educational organizations of higher education and scientific organizations and the development of the National System of Research and Development Performance Assessment. The aim is to identify the trend of ways in the presentation of the data of activity results of scientific organizations and educational organizations of higher education by conducting a comparative analysis of the dynamics of publication and inventive activity of these organizations without additional submission of proposals for their change at the current stage.. The research was conducted by the method of comparative analysis of statistical data on the number of patent applications and published scientific articles by educational organizations of higher education and scientific organizations as ways of presenting the results of scientific research. The novelty is characterized by the methodology of selection of scientific organizations and educational organizations of higher education and their performance indicators for the extraction of statistical data. As a result of the comparative analysis, the tendency of changing the way of presenting the data of results of scientific research in recent years from the publication of articles to the filing of applications for patents for invention is revealed. The results obtained are of interest to a wide range of experts involved in the discussion of the transformation of performance indicators of scientific organizations and educational organizations of higher education in the context of achieving the objectives of ensuring technological sovereignty of the country.

As a result of the conducted research, information on the trends in the presentation of the results of scientific research is obtained, and conclusions are drawn about the need to continue further research, taking into account the updating of legislation to develop integrated performance indicators of scientific and educational organizations.

1. Иванчик, А. И. Особенности оценки исследователей и исследовательских программ в гуманитарных науках // М.: Вестник Российской академии наук. – 2018. – Т. 88, № 11. – С. 985–991. – DOI: 10.31857/S086958730002331–2.

2. Паршин, А. Н. Наука или библиометрия: кто кого? // М.: Вестник Российской академии наук. – 2018. – т. 88, № 11. – С. 982–984. – URL: http://ras.jes.su/rasherald/s207987840001532-4-1 (дата обращения: 12.03.2024).

3. Алавердов, А. Р. Публикационная активность преподавателей отечественной высшей школы и резервы ее повышения // Высшее образование в России. – 2019. – Т. 28, № 2. – С. 23–36. – DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-2-23-36.

4. Дымкова, С. С. Наукометрические инструменты в оценке и управлении публикационной активностью научных организаций // Культура: теория и практика. – 2021. – № 5–6 (44–45). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/naukometricheskie-instrumenty-v-otsenkei-upravlenii-publikatsionnoy-aktivnostyu-nauchnyhorganizatsiy (дата обращения: 19.02.2024).

5. Вислый, А. И. Публикации и патенты как индикатор успеха научных и образовательных организаций в современных условиях / А. И. Вислый, М. С. Борисова // Интеллектуальная собственность для государства и человека: сборник докладов XXVII Международной научно-практической конференции Роспатента, Москва, 28–29 сентября 2023 года. – Москва: Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение «Федеральный институт промышленной собственности», 2023. – С. 19–23.

6. Неретин, О. П. Изучение способов представления результатов отечественных исследований и разработок / О. П. Неретин, Н. В. Лопатина // Вестник ФИПС. – 2022. – Т. 1, № 1. – С. 16-19.