Artificial intelligence technologies: new patenting rules
Abstract
The article presents the results of a study on problematic issues related to the disclosure of information on inventions and utility models based on the use of AI in a patent application. Based on the analysis of foreign experience and domestic law enforcement practice, substantiated proposals have been developed for adjusting the requirements for application documents and the rules for their examination in the form of draft legal norms. In particular, lists of AI features that can characterize AI in the claims are formulated, as well as requirements for disclosure in the description of the characteristics of training data, training methods, and the AI model validation (verification) strategy.
About the Authors
O. L. AlekseevaRussian Federation
Olga L. Alekseeva, Cand. Sci. (Law), Head of the Quality Monitoring Center
Moscow, Berezhkovskaya emb., 30 bld. 1
Y. S. Zaytsev
Russian Federation
Yury S. Zaitsev, Deputy Head of the Quality Monitoring Center
Moscow, Berezhkovskaya emb., 30 bld. 1
References
1. Yanisky-Ravid, S. and Jin, R. (2020), “Summoning a New Artificial Intelligence Patent Model: In the Age of Pandemic”, SSRN Electronic Journal, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3619069 (Accessed 25 November 2025).
2. Ha, T., Teh, J.L., Allen, J.G., Karuppiah, B. and Peng, H. (2024), When Code Creates: A Landscape Report on Issues at the Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Law, IPOS, SMU Centre for AI & Data Governance, Singapore.
3. Kartskhiya, A. A. and Ivliev, G. P. (2025), “Modern understanding of artificial intelligence: legal aspect”, Intellectual Property, Industrial Property, no. 4, pp. 4–12.
4. Ivliev, G. P. and Kartskhiya, A. A. (2023), “Ethics of the Digitalization Era”, Intellectual Property. Copyright and Related Rights, no. 1, pp. 21–39.
5. Früh, A. (2019), “Transparency in the Patent System – Artificial Intelligence and the Disclosure Requirement”, in Pacud, Z. and Sikorski, R. (ed.), Rethinking Patent Law as an Incentive to Innovation, Wolters Kluwer, Warsaw.
6. Ebrahim, T. Y. (2020), “Artificial Intelligence Inventions & Patent Disclosure”, Penn State Law Review, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 147–221.
7. Heijden, H. van der (2019), “AI inventions and sufficiency of disclosure – when enough is enough”, IAM [Online], available at: https://www.iam-media.com/article/ai-inventions-and-sufficiency-of-disclo-sure-when-enough-enoughhttps://www.iam-media.com/article/ai-inventions-and-sufficiency-of-disclo-sure-when-enough-enough (Accessed 25 November 2025).
8. Alekseeva, O. L. and Zaytsev, Yu. S. (2025), “Artificial intelligence technologies: disclosure issues in a patent application”, Bulletin of Federal Institute of Industrial Property, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 24–31.
9. Poursoltani, M. (2021), “Disclosing AI Inventions”, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, vol. 29, pp. 41–64.
10. Liu, S. (2022), “A Helper for Patenting the “Unpredictable”: Artificial Intelligence”, Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 671–732.
11. Drexl, J., Hilty, R.M., Beneke, F. et al. (2019), Technical Aspects of Artificial Intelligence: An Understanding from an Intellectual Property Law Perspective, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.
Review
For citations:
Alekseeva O.L., Zaytsev Y.S. Artificial intelligence technologies: new patenting rules. Bulletin of Federal institute of industrial property. 2025;4(4):298–307. (In Russ.)
JATS XML









