Preview

Bulletin of Federal institute of industrial property

Advanced search

Conditions and methods for the successful implementation of improvements to electronic filing services for intellectual property objects

Abstract

The digitalization of public services for intellectual property objects registration is accompanied by the development of specialized services, such as the Rospatent’s public services on state portal “Gos­uslugi”, the ARM “Registrar”, the Personal account on FIPS’s web-site, and “EAPO-ONLINE”. Despite the introduction of new technological solutions, the client-centricity of these platforms remains limited. The purpose of this study was to identify regulatory barriers that hinder the implementation of user scenarios focused on convenience, flexibility, and adaptability. The work uses an online survey method covering professional and non-professional users. The analysis is conducted on a number of parameters: satisfaction, frequency of use, identified problems, emotional response and recommendations. Respondents indicated many difficulties that could not be eliminated within the framework of current administrative regulations. Among them are duplication of input data, lack of personalized interfaces, inflexibility of submission forms and overload of instructional information. The obtained results confirm the hypothesis about the critical role of regulatory restrictions in shaping user experience. The novelty of the study lies in the focus on the regulatory component of digital services and the analysis of its impact on user experience. The practical significance is expressed in the need to revise current regulations in order to create flexible, adaptable and customer-oriented platforms. The conclusions of the article highlight the importance of improving and developing the regulatory framework as a condition for increasing the efficiency of digital services. In the future, it is planned to study the wording of regulations and develop models of regulatory sandboxes for testing flexible interface solutions.

About the Authors

R. O. Knyazev
Federal Institute of Industrial Property
Russian Federation

Rostislav O. Knyazev, Senior Specialist of Department of system and business analysis

Moscow, Berezhkovskaya emb., 30, bld. 1



P. A. Timik
Federal Institute of Industrial Property
Russian Federation

Polina A. Timik, Head of Digital Transformation Project Center (technical customer service)

Moscow, Berezhkovskaya emb., 30, bld. 1



I. Yu. Kononenko
Federal Institute of Industrial Property
Russian Federation

Ilya Yu. Kononenko, Deputy Director

Moscow, Berezhkovskaya emb., 30, bld. 1



References

1. Ponkratov, A. I. (2021), “Prospects of digitalization in the state registration of intellectual property objects”, Pravo intellektualnoy sobstvennosti, no. 2, pp. 15‑18. https://doi.org/10.18572/2072‑4322‑2021‑2‑15‑18

2. Vasiliev, G. I. and Yushkov, E. S. (2021), “Digitalization as a tool to stimulate the growth of patent activity”, Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra, vol. 11, no. 1–1, pp. 380–385. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2021.20.77.042

3. Filippova, S. Y. and Kharitonova, Y. S. (2025), “Digital platforms in law and the law of digital platforms: new challenges for the legislator and solutions”, Pravovedenie, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 58–75. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2025.104

4. Gvozdetskiy, D. S. (2024), “Digitalization of regulatory procedures in lawmaking activities of federal executive authorities”, Zakon i pravo, no.1, pp. 15–19. https://doi.org/10.24412/2073‑3313‑2024‑1‑15‑19

5. Vasilyeva, E. V. (2020), “Principles of transition of public service to an omnichannel digital strategy”, Vestnik universiteta, no. 4, pp. 5–13. https://doi.org/10.2642/1816‑4277‑2020‑4‑5‑13

6. Karaulova, O. A. (2025), “Trust in digital services: UX design and sociological mechanisms of trust”, Akademicheskaya nauka, no.1, pp. 103–106, available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/doverie-k-tsifrovym-servis-am-ux-dizayn-i-sotsiologicheskie-mehanizmy-doveriya (Accessed 12 August 2025).

7. Nikiforov, A. A. (2025), “Peculiarities of approaches to digital transformation of public administration abroad and in Russia”, Kaspiyskiy region: politika, ekonomika, kultura, no. 1 (82), pp. 82‑98. https://doi.org/10.54398/1818-510X.2025.82.4.009

8. Kuznetsov, P. U. (2021), “Digital transformation of public administration as a stage of informatization development in Russia”, Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya: Pravo, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 3–10, available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tsifrovaya-transformatsiya-gosudarstvenno-go-upravleniya-kak-etap-razvitiya-informatizatsii-v-rossii (Accessed 13 August 2025).

9. Sellung, R., Hölscher, M. and Burgstaller-Hochenwarter, L. (2022), “Good practices of user experience and design research for mobile and electronic governmental services”, in Kő, A., Francesconi, E., Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A.M. and Khalil, I. (eds.), ­ Electronic government and the information systems perspective, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 138‑149. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑3‑031‑12673‑4_10

10. Kelekhsaeva, D. B. (2025), “Digitalization of public administration: legal challenges and prospects”, Nexus, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 2–4.


Review

For citations:


Knyazev R.O., Timik P.A., Kononenko I.Yu. Conditions and methods for the successful implementation of improvements to electronic filing services for intellectual property objects. Bulletin of Federal institute of industrial property. 2025;4(4):316–325. (In Russ.)

Views: 144

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-5086 (Print)
ISSN 2959-2432 (Online)